Hottest Tech IPOs to watch.
Pets com

Pets com

San Francisco, California, United States

Industry: E-commerce/Retail

Region: US 🇺🇸

Year Founded: 1998

IPO Date: 01-02-2000

Market Cap: $82.5 million (at IPO)

Number of Employees: n/a

Revenue: n/a

Net Income: n/a IPO went public on February 9, 2000.

The company’s initial public offering (IPO) was highly anticipated and generated significant investor interest.

With its catchy advertising campaigns and promises of revolutionizing the pet industry, raised $82.5 million through its IPO.

However, despite the initial excitement, the company faced numerous challenges in its business model and struggled to achieve profitability.

As a result, ultimately shut down just nine months after its IPO, making it one of the most prominent casualties of the dot-com bubble.

Company Overview & History was founded in 1998 and quickly gained attention as an online retailer specializing in pet supplies and accessories.

The company aimed to provide pet owners with a convenient way to purchase a wide range of pet-related products through its user-friendly website. gained widespread recognition through its iconic sock puppet mascot, which became a pop culture phenomenon during the late 1990s.

Despite its short-lived existence, played a significant role in shaping the e-commerce landscape and highlighting the challenges faced by online businesses during the dot-com era.

Financial Performance

YearRevenue($B)Net Income($B)EBITDA($B)Operational Cash Flow($B)

Business Model operated as an e-commerce platform, offering a comprehensive selection of pet supplies and related products.

The company aimed to provide a convenient and hassle-free shopping experience for pet owners, allowing them to browse and purchase items from the comfort of their homes. leveraged its online presence to offer a wide range of pet products, including food, toys, accessories, and grooming supplies.

Additionally, the company implemented a delivery service to ensure customers received their orders promptly.

However, faced substantial challenges in scaling its operations, maintaining competitive pricing, and managing logistics, leading to its eventual demise.

Market Cap Over the Years

YearMarket Cap($B)

Risk Factors

Like many dot-com-era startups, faced several risk factors that contributed to its failure.

One significant risk factor was the company’s high operating costs, which stemmed from the need to maintain inventory, manage distribution, and cover marketing expenses. struggled to achieve economies of scale and maintain profitability, as it faced intense competition from established brick-and-mortar retailers and other emerging online players.

Furthermore, the company relied heavily on partnerships and agreements with suppliers, making it vulnerable to disruptions in the supply chain.

Ultimately, these risk factors, coupled with the challenging market conditions of the dot-com bubble, proved insurmountable for

Market Opportunity

At the time of its launch, sought to capitalize on the growing trend of e-commerce and the increasing number of pet owners looking for convenient ways to purchase pet supplies.

The pet industry represented a substantial market opportunity, with pet owners willing to spend significant amounts on their pets’ well-being. aimed to tap into this market by offering a wide range of products and leveraging the convenience of online shopping.

However, while the potential market size was substantial, the company struggled to differentiate itself and establish a sustainable competitive advantage in a crowded and competitive industry.


  • Chewy
  • PetSmart
  • Petco
  • Amazon Pets
  • Walmart Pet Supplies
  • Target Pet Essentials
  • 1800PetMeds
  • PetFlow

Key/Fun Company Facts

  •’s sock puppet mascot became an iconic symbol of the dot-com era and garnered significant attention through its appearances in Super Bowl commercials.
  • The company’s IPO generated substantial excitement and investor interest, but’s stock value plummeted shortly after going public.
  • faced challenges in managing its supply chain, particularly with the logistics and distribution of pet products.
  • The company’s failure highlighted the importance of sustainable business models and profitability in the rapidly evolving e-commerce landscape.
  • Despite its short lifespan, left a lasting impact on the e-commerce industry, serving as a cautionary tale and influencing subsequent startups’ strategies and approaches.